Section 4-1: Review of wound management materials - (Untitled Section)
This sections contains a brief review of the dressings contained within the
Drug Tariff, together with those pharmaceutical items in Section 13.10 and
13.11 of the Welsh Prescribing Catalogue that are used in wound management.
This section is intended to provide users with background information on the
products that are available in an easily understandable form and explain, where
possible, how the physical properties of these materials influence their
clinical applications as described in Section 4.
Primary wound dressings
Hydrocolloid dressings - Key features
Three hydrocolloid dressings are listed in the Drug Tariff, and these vary
significantly in their composition and physical characteristics. The products
differ in price, but in the absence of hard published data on their relative
clinical effectiveness, it is not possible to make any recommendation on
preferred usage.
- Hydrocolloid dressings consist of a self-adhesive gel-forming mass which
may contain sodium carboxymethylcellulose, gelatin and pectin, applied to a
carrier such as a thin polyurethane film or foam sheet.
- Used for light to moderately exuding wounds including pressure sores[Image-15K],minor burns[Image-16K]
and traumatic injuries. Also used extensively in the management ofleg ulcers[Image-16K] where they appear to have advantages in the treatment of wounds that
fail to respond to compression therapy alone.
- In their intact state, hydrocolloids are initially virtually impermeable
to water vapour and for this reason they are often used to facilitate
rehydration and autolytic debridement of dry sloughy or necrotic wounds[Image-16K].
- Because hydrocolloid dressings do not cause pain on removal, they are
particularly useful in paediatric wound care for the management of both acute
and chronic wounds.
Table 2: Hydrocolloid dressings
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost (p) |
| Tegasorb (oval) (£24,269) |
10 x 12 |
201 |
|
13 x 15 |
379 |
| Granuflex (£591,566) |
10 x 10 |
212 |
|
15 x 15 |
399 |
|
15 x 20 |
435 |
|
20 x 20 |
599 |
| Comfeel (£241,056) |
10 x 10 |
211 |
|
15 x 15 |
419 |
|
20 x 20 |
628 |
Figures
in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Semipermeable adhesive film dressing - Key features
There are currently four adhesive film dressings available on the Tariff. They
are all made from a thin sheet of polyurethane coated with a layer of acrylic
adhesive.
- The dressings are permeable to moisture vapour and gases but impermeable
to liquids.
- Film dressings have a wide range of applications. Their use has been
reported in burns, donor sites[Image-16K], surgical wounds and superficial pressure sores[Image-15K].
They are also used as secondary dressings in combination with alginates and
hydrogels and are applied prophylactically to prevent damage caused by shearing
forces to the skin of patients confined to bed.
- Although the physical properties of the films from which the dressings
are constructed are broadly comparable major differences exist in the
application systems that have been developed.
- Users often express a strong preference for a particular brand of film
dressing because they have become familiar with its method of use. It is argued
that a change to an alternative product with a different application system
could lead to wastage and therefore increase rather than reduce costs.
- Despite the `brand loyalty' shown to particular makes of dressing,
significant savings are possible if prescribing practices can be changed.
Table 3: Semipermeable film dressings
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost (p) |
| Cutifilm (£2,125) |
10 x 14 |
106 |
|
7.5 x 10 |
62 |
| Opsite (£157,077) |
10 x 12 |
116 |
|
|
|
| Tegaderm (£331,306) |
10 x 12 |
121 |
|
|
|
| Bioclusive (£35,871) |
10.2 x 12.7 |
128 |
|
|
|
Figures in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Perforated film absorbent dressings - Key features
Three perforated film dressings are included in the Drug Tariff; These
dressings are designed to combine a degree of absorbence with low-adherence for
the management of lightly exuding superficial wounds.
- They consist of an absorbent fibrous fleece covered with a plastic film
containing a series of small holes arranged in a uniform pattern.
- The plastic film is intended to prevent the dressing adhering to the
surface of the wound and the holes are present to allow the passage of exudate
through to the absorbent layer.
- Perforated film absorbent dressings are widely used in the treatment of
superficial wounds and are frequently applied in combination with hydrogels or
alginates.
- The ability of these dressings to absorb exudate is limited, and for
heavily exuding wounds they are sometimes covered with a second absorbent pad.
In these situations the absorbency of the dressing is less important than its
low-adherent properties.
Table 4: Perforated film absorbent dressings
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost (p) |
| Skintact (£879) |
5 x 5 |
10 |
|
10 x 10 |
17 |
|
20 x 10 |
33 |
| Release (£14,864) |
5 x 5 |
11 |
|
10 x 10 |
19 |
|
20 x 10 |
36 |
| Melolin (£308,008) |
5 x 5 |
12 |
|
10 x 10 |
20 |
|
20 x 10 |
39 |
Figures
in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Alginate dressings - Key features
Alginate dressings are produced from the calcium and sodium salts of alginic
acid, a polymer obtained from seaweed that is composed of mannuronic and
guluronic acid residues.
- Calcium alginate is insoluble in water but in the presence of sodium
ions from wound exudate, a partial ion exchange reaction takes place resulting
in the production of sodium alginate which forms a hydrophilic gel on the wound
surface that is believed to facilitate healing.
- The physical and chemical properties of the dressings depend upon the
content of calcium and sodium ions and the relative concentration and
arrangement of the mannuronic and guluronic monomers. Dressings rich in
mannuronic acid, tend to react readily with sodium ions, forming soft amorphous
gels. Dressings rich in guluronic acid gel less readily and form firmer less
mobile gels.
- Five alginate dressings are available on the Drug Tariff. Most consist
of calcium alginate formed into textile fibres.
- Sorbsan consists primarily of fibres of calcium alginate rich in
mannuronic acid.
- Kaltostat is produced from fibres of calcium/sodium (80:20)
alginate rich in guluronic acid.
- Tegagel is chemically similar to Sorbsan but more closely
resembles Kaltostat in appearance.
- Kaltogel, a new addition to the Tariff, is also rich in
mannuronic acid but also contains 20% sodium alginate to facilitate rapid
gelling.
- Comfeel Alginate Dressing, rich in guluronic acid, is made
by a freeze drying process and is therefore a fibre-free mass of calcium
alginate which is supported on a nylon mesh net.
- Alginate dressings are used primarily for the treatment of exuding
wounds such as leg ulcers, acute surgical wounds sinuses[Image-15K] and other cavity
wounds such as pressure sores[Image-15K].
- Alginates also have haemostatic properties, and one product, Kaltostat,
has a product licence for this application.
- The chemical and physical properties of the alginate dressings are very
different and this has implications for the selection and method of use of the
products concerned. Sorbsan and Kaltogel are soluble in 0.9% sodium chloride
solution and is therefore easily removed from a cavity wound or sinus[Image-15K] by
irrigation. Tegagel and Kaltostat are less soluble and therefore may be removed
from the wound intact as may the Comfeel product.
- Although there is some anecdotal evidence to indicate that at least one
alginate, Sorbsan, may be of value in the management of sloughy, necrotic orinfected wounds[Image-16K]
but this has not been confirmed in a clinical trial.
Table 5: Alginate dressings
| Size |
Comfeel |
Kaltogel |
Kaltostat |
Sorbsan |
Tegagel |
| cm |
(No data) |
(No data) |
(£162,241) |
(£192,409) |
(No data) |
| 5 x 5 |
|
0.70 |
0.72 |
0.87 |
0.72 |
| 6 x 4 |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
| 7.5 x 12 |
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
| 10 x 10 |
1.44 |
1.45 |
|
1.54 |
1.50 |
Figures
in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Low-adherent wound contact layers - Key features
Low-adherent wound contact layers are used as interface layers to prevent a
secondary absorbent dressing from adhering to the surface of a wound and
causing trauma on removal. They are available both plain and impregnated with
white soft paraffin which may also contain an antibacterial agent.
Unmedicated low-adherent wound contact layers
- Knitted Viscose Primary Dressing BP, more familiarly known as NA
Dressing or Tricotex, is a simple knitted fabric that is claimed to have
limited adherence properties. This dressing is commonly used as the initial
layer of the Four Layer Bandage system.
- For many applications, NA Dressing and Tricotex have largely replaced
paraffin gauze dressings (tulles), which, despite their greasy nature and
description of `low-adherent dressings', often become firmly attached to the
surface of a wound causing pain or discomfort upon removal.
Table 6: Plain, low-adherent wound contact agents
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost (p) |
| N-A Dressing (£80,980) |
9.5 x 9.5 |
23 |
| Tricotex (£20,238) |
9.5 x 9.5 |
28 |
| Paraffin Gauze(£44,512) |
|
|
| Individually wrapped |
10 x 10 |
30 |
| Bulk pack of 10 |
10 x 10 |
210 |
Medicated low-adherent wound contact layers
Paraffin gauze dressings can be medicated with antibiotics such as sodium
fusidate and framycetin but these may cause sensitivity reactions and the
development of resistant strains of micro-organisms.
- Dressings such as Bactigras and Serotulle contain an antiseptic,
chlorhexidine, instead of an antibiotic and are therefore generally considered
to be free of these disadvantages.
- Laboratory tests suggest that the chlorhexidine is not readily released
from the hydrophobic paraffin base and therefore the antibacterial activity of
these dressings is likely to be limited.
- Inadine contains povidone iodine in polyethylene glycol which is
hydrophilic and therefore better able to liberate the antimicrobial agent into
wound exudate in order to exert a bactericidal effect.
Table 7: Medicated Low-adherent wound contact layers
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost (p) |
| Inadine (£82,376) |
5 x 5 |
25 |
|
9.5 x 9.5 |
38 |
| Chlorhexidine Gauze Dressing BP |
5 x 5 |
21 |
| (Bactigras, Serotulle, Chlorhexitulle) (£45,852) |
10 x10 |
45 |
| Fucidin Intertulle* (£2,363) |
10 x 10 |
22 |
| Sofra Tulle* (£18,148) |
10 x 10 |
23 |
* The use of these dressings should be avoided where possible.Hydrogel dressings - Key features
Hydrogels consists of insoluble polymers with hydrophilic sites which interact
with aqueous solutions, absorbing and retaining significant volumes of water.
- Intrasite gel, the only hydrogel is currently available in the Drug
Tariff, contains approximately 1-2% carboxy-methylcellulose, 80% water, and 20%
propylene glycol as a humectant and preservative.
- The gel has the ability to absorb or donate liquid according to the
state of hydration of the tissue to which it is applied.
- Intrasite is also sometimes used as a carrier for metronidazole in the
treatment of fungating and other malodorous wounds.
- The primary indication for the use of the gel is the cleansing of
sloughy and necrotic wounds[Image-16K] which it does by rehydrating dead tissue and
encouraging autolytic debridement.
- Intrasite gel can be used for the management of problem wounds such assinuses[Image-15K]
and infected surgical wounds that may be difficult to dress with
alternative products.
- The gel has also been used with advantage in the treatment of
extravasation injuries in neonates.
- A generous layer of gel is applied to the surface of a wound and covered
with a perforated plastic film dressing such as Melolin or Release or a
semipermeable adhesive film depending upon the location and condition of the
lesion.
- On very dry wounds it is usual to change the dressing at least once per
day.
Table 8: Hydrogel dressing
| Product |
Size |
Cost (p) |
| Intrasite (£178,579) |
15 grams |
181 |
Figures
in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Polysaccharide bead dressings - Key features
Dressings made from polysaccharide beads were amongst the first `modern'
products to be used in wound management. Two different types of beads are
available which are used in a number of different formulations.
- Debrisan consists of absorbent dextranomer microspheres about 0.2
mm in diameter. When introduced into a wound the beads absorb exudate and
cellular debris and so assist with wound debridement
- Because of practical problems associated with the use of the free
flowing beads, they are also produced in the form of a paste in which they are
mixed with polyethylene glycol.
- Debrisan Absorbent Pads are textile bags containing Debrisan Paste that
can be easily applied to, and removed from, an appropriate wound.
- Iodosorb consists of microspheres of chemically modified starch which
contain 0.9% elemental iodine which is released when the beads absorb water and
swell.
- Like Debrisan, Iodosorb is used for the treatment of moist sloughy
wounds particularly when infection is present.
- Also like Debrisan, Iodosorb is available in the form of a paste or
ointment which is used in situations were application of the free flowing beads
would be impractical.
- Iodoflex, used in the management of relatively large shallow wounds,
consists of a layer of Iodosorb ointment sandwiched between two pieces of
gauze, one of which is removed before the dressing is applied to the wound
surface.
Table 9: Polysaccharide bead dressings
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost |
| Iodosorb range (£120,789) |
|
|
| Iodosorb Powder |
7 x 3 g sachet |
£13.50 |
| Iodosorb Ointment |
4 x 10 g sachet |
£18.05 |
|
2 x 20 sachet |
£18.05 |
| Iodoflex |
5 x 5 g sachet |
£20.40 |
|
3 x 10 g sachet |
£24.50 |
|
2 x 17 g sachet |
£25.84 |
| Debrisan range (£7,687) |
|
|
| Debrisan Beads |
10 x 4 g sachet |
£19.38 |
|
60 g pot |
£29.01 |
| Debrisan Paste |
4 x 10 g sachet |
£19.89 |
|
6 x 10 g sachet |
£29.93 |
| Debrisan Pad |
3 g pad |
£2.30 |
Figures in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Polyurethane foam dressing - Key features
There are five polyurethane foam dressing included in the Drug Tariff which
have very different performance characteristics and indication.
- Lyofoam consists of an open-cell polyurethane foam sheet, one surface of
which has been heat treated to collapse the cells of the foam and allow it to
take up blood or wound exudate by capillarity. It is used in the management of
a variety of different wound types including leg ulcers, traumatic wounds,minor burns[Image-16K]
, and donor sites[Image-16K]
- Unlike most absorbent dressings, Lyofoam transmits absorbed fluid
laterally across the face of the dressing rather than from front to back. For
this reason, a size of Lyofoam should always be selected which overlaps the
edges of the wound by about 2-3 cm.
- Allevyn is three component dressing consisting of a hydrophilic
polyurethane foam layer about 3 mm thick sandwiched between a low-adherent net
facing layer and a polyurethane film backing. The dressing is highly absorbent
and is useful for the management of moderate-heavily exuding wounds such as legulcers[Image-16K] and fungating tumours.
- Allevyn adhesive consists of a piece of Allevyn foam which is bonded to
a piece of polyurethane foam to form an island dressing the surface of which is
coated with adhesive.
- Spyrosorb is thin sheet of polyurethane foam coated with adhesive. The
dressing which is very conformable, has limited absorbent capacity but is
highly permeable to moisture vapour. It is used for dressing relatively
shallow, lightly exuding wounds or wounds in the final stages of healing.
- Tielle is a sophisticated island dressing consisting of a piece of
polyurethane film/foam, located in the centre of an adhesive moisture vapour
permeable, polyurethane membrane. The dressing is highly permeable to moisture
vapour which makes it suitable for application to moderately exuding wounds
despite its limited absorbent capacity.
Table 10: Polyurethane foam dressing
| Product |
Size (cm) |
Cost (p) |
| Lyofoam (£61,738) |
7.5 x 7.5 |
83 |
|
10 x 10 |
99 |
|
17.5 x 10 |
154 |
|
20 x 15 |
208 |
| Allevyn (No data) |
5 x 5 |
93 |
|
10 x 10 |
185 |
|
10 x 20 |
295 |
|
20 x 20 |
495 |
| Allevyn Adhesive (No data) |
7.5 x 7.5 |
112 |
|
12.5 x 12.5 |
202 |
|
17.5 x 17.5 |
398 |
|
22.5 x 22.5 |
579 |
| Tielle (No data) |
11 x 11 |
192 |
|
15 x 20 |
399 |
|
18 x 18 |
399 |
| Spyrosorb (No data) |
10 x 10 |
198 |
|
20 x 20 |
565 |
Figures in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Miscellaneous dressings
Miscellaneous wound management products that are included in the Drug Tariff
are shown below.
Table 11: Miscellaneous dressings
| Product Group |
Cost (p) |
| Airstrip dressing (£179) |
30 |
| Boil dressing pack (£14) |
64 |
| Standard dressing No 4 (£47) |
54 |
| Sterile eye pad (£2,310) |
47 |
Figures
in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Dressing packs
Dressing packs, sometimes also called procedure packs, provide the nurse
practitioner with a selection of sterile wound care items conveniently packaged
together. Four different packs are included in the Drug Tariff.
- Pack A, (Drug Tariff Specification 10), contains woven cotton swabs and
a piece of gauze and cotton tissue (Gamgee).
- Pack B (Drug Tariff Specification 35) contains nonwoven swabs and a
proprietary dressing pad. Both packs also contain absorbent cotton balls, a
paper towel and an inner wrap that opens out to form a sterile field.
These packs are generally used when changing a dressing or carrying out some
similar procedure.
- Multiple dressing packs 1 and 2 contain absorbent cotton rolls,
absorbent gauze and white open wove bandages. These items are intended to be
used together to form a dressing. The precise indications for the use of these
packs is uncertain but they are relatively expensive and as there can be little
place for a dressing made from these three components in modern wound
management, their use should be discontinued in favour of more cost effective
alternatives.
Table 12: Wound dressing packs
| Product Group |
Cost (p) |
| Dressing pack A (Spec 10) (£536,707) |
69 |
| Dressing pack B (Spec 35) (£74,186) |
74 |
| Multiple dressing pack (No 1) (£4,177) |
300 |
| Multiple dressing pack (No 2) (£276) |
503 |
Figures in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.Note
The expenditure upon dressing packs quoted in the table above does not
reflect the total sum spent in Wales on these items. At least one very large
Authority purchases their packs from the hospital CSSD and this expenditure is
not reflected in Table 12
Surgical absorbents
Surgical absorbents are products which, although not designed to be left in
intimate contact with damaged tissue, may be used for cleansing purposes or as
secondary absorbent layers over a primary dressing in the management of heavily
exuding wounds.
Cotton/nonwoven swabs - Key features
- Surgical swabs are traditionally produced from Gauze, a simple woven
fabric made from absorbent cotton.
- Developments in textile technology have led to the production of
nonwoven fabrics manufactured principally from viscose which have a number of
advantages over woven cotton.
- Nonwovens are generally more absorbent and are less likely to shed
fibrous material into the wound which may delay healing or predispose the wound
to infection.They are also significantly cheaper.
- Filmated swab contains a thin layer of absorbent cotton (cotton wool)
which is included to improve the fluid handling properties, although the
presence of the loose cotton fibres must increase the risk of particulate loss
from the finished product.
- Filmated swabs may be manufactured from either woven or nonwoven fabric
but laboratory tests have shown that despite the presence of the fibrous cotton
interliner, the filmated swabs available upon prescription are inferior in
performance terms to the ordinary nonwoven product despite being significantly
more expensive
Table 13: Non-sterile swabs
| Non sterile swabs (100s) 10 cm x 10 cm |
Cost (p) |
| Nonwoven swabs (£11,584) |
234 |
| Cotton gauze swabs BP (£127,208) |
498 |
| Nonwoven filmated (Regal) (£15,930) |
507 |
| Cotton gauze filmated (£4,540) |
620 |
Table 14: Sterile swabs
| Sterile swabs (5s) (7.5 cm x 7.5 cm) |
Cost (p) |
| Nonwoven Swabs (£3,686) |
20 |
| Cotton Gauze BP (£34,103) |
29 |
Figures in ( ) indicate expenditure for period July 1993-June 1994.
Gauze and cotton tissue - Key features
More familiarly known by its trade name of `Gamgee Tissue' it consists of a
layer of absorbent cotton enclosed in a sleeve of cotton gauze.
- Gamgee tissue is used to absorb exudate from heavily exuding wounds and
should be applied over a primary wound dressing to avoid contaminating the
wound with cellulose fibres.
Absorbent cotton rolls - Key features
- Absorbent cotton (cotton wool) should not be used as a dressing material
because of the problems of fibre loss.
- The material available on the Tariff is not sterile and this should also
preclude its use as a primary wound dressing.
- Absorbent cotton is sometimes used as a padding material under bandages
to prevent pressure damage to tissue over bony prominences, and for swabbing
skin prior to injection.
- Over 13 metric tons of absorbent cotton are prescribed annually in Wales.
Absorbent lint - Key features
- Like absorbent cotton, lint sheds excessive amounts of fibrous material
and therefore has no place in wound management.
- Discussions with community nursing staff indicate that they never use it
and therefore it must be assumed that it is provided direct to patients for
some undefined purpose.
Absorbent gauze rolls - Key features
- Absorbent gauze rolls, including ribbon gauze, are available in both the
sterile and non sterile form.
- Sterile ribbon gauze and the sterile version of the larger rolls product
is sometimes used for packing wounds but there is no information to suggest
what the non sterile material is used for.
Cellulose Wadding - Key features
- Cellulose wadding consists of a layer of cellulose wadding in a tube of
cotton gauze.
- The product is not sterile and is used principally as an absorbent for
non-surgical applications (e.g. incontinence). It should therefore not be
regarded as a dressing.
Table 15: Surgical absorbents
| Product Group |
No of items |
Expenditure |
| Gauze and cotton tissue rolls |
25,376 |
130,778 |
| Absorbent cotton rolls * |
47,616 |
112,695 |
| Absorbent lint * |
7,650 |
34,374 |
| Absorbent cotton gauze rolls * |
23,507 |
34,004 |
| Cellulose wadding |
591 |
1,291 |
The items marked * in the table above are available in a range of sizes. The
values quoted here for the number of items prescribed represent the sum of
all sizes in each case.
Extensible/Bandages
The bandages in the Drug Tariff may be classified into groups according to
their function and performance. Considerable financial savings may be achieved
by ensuring that these are used appropriately.
Retention bandages -Key features
As their name suggests, these bandages are used to retain dressings in place.
They should not be used to apply pressure as they are unsuitable for this
purpose.
- The first `retention bandage' was White Open Wove (WOW) a rigid fabric
with extremely limited conformability that is available in a range of widths.
- Because of the poor performance characteristics of WOW two softer more
conformable bandages were introduced. These are Kling and Crinx the Cotton
Conforming Bandages of the British Pharmacopoiea.
- Recently, new lightweight bandages have been developed that have
advantages over the simple cotton products. Some of these are included in the
Tariff, and although they vary in performance and price, all of them are
cheaper than the products they are designed to replace.
Table 16: Retention bandages
| Bandage Type |
Cost (p) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5cm |
5 cm |
7.5cm |
10 cm |
15 cm |
| K-Band |
- |
16 |
20 |
23 |
39 |
| Easifix |
- |
30 |
37 |
43 |
73 |
| Stayform |
- |
30 |
38 |
43 |
73 |
| Slinky |
- |
37 |
52 |
63 |
89 |
| Crinx |
- |
56 |
70 |
85 |
117 |
| Kling |
- |
58 |
75 |
91 |
120 |
| White open wove |
27 |
45 |
64 |
84 |
- |
Support Bandages - Key features
Support may be defined as the retention and control of tissue without the
application of compression. It is usually provided to prevent the development
of a deformity or change in shape of a mass of tissue due to swelling or
sagging.
- The support bandages available on the Drug Tariff are Crepe Bandage BP,
woven from cotton and wool, and Cotton Crepe Bandage BP - more familiarly known
as Elastocrepe which is made entirely of cotton.
- Both types of bandage have been used to provide support in the treatment
of sprains and strains and to apply compression in the management of leg ulcers
caused by venous insufficiency.
- Numerous published studies have demonstrated, however, that the elastic
properties of these bandages are such that they are unable to provide and
maintain the levels of pressure that are required for this indication and
therefore they should not be used for this purpose.
- Competent compression bandages containing elastomeric yarns are much
better suited for this application, and these are described in the following
section.
- It is likely that a significant proportion of all crepe bandages
supplied are used inappropriately for dressing retention. This is not cost
effective, for these bandages are much more expensive than the bandages
described in Table 16.
Table 17: Support Bandages
| Bandage Type |
Cost (p) |
|
|
|
|
5 cm |
7.5 cm |
10 cm |
15 cm |
| Crepe BP |
79 |
110 |
146 |
208 |
| Cotton Crepe |
- |
251 |
325 |
- |
Compression Bandages - Key features
Compression implies the application of clinically effective levels of external
pressure, applied to modify or assist a physiological process - generally blood
flow. The bandages in the Drug Tariff that are suitable for the application of
high levels of compression are shown in Table 18.
- The inappropriate use of compression bandages can have very serious
consequences, resulting in extreme cases in necrosis and amputation[Image-0K]
- It is vitally important that no form of high compression bandaging
system is applied to a patient unless the possibility of arterial disease has
first been excluded by some appropriate method.
- Where crepe bandages are being used to provide compression, a
change to a more effective product such as Setopress or Tensopress should be
considered.
- When crepe bandages are being used to apply compression, a change to a
more clinically effective product will result in an increase in
expenditure but an improvement in patient care.
Table 18: Compression bandages
| Bandage Type |
Cost (p) |
|
|
7.5 cm |
10 cm |
| Tensopress |
225 |
292 |
| Setopress |
229 |
296 |
| Blue line with foot loop |
402 |
- |
| Red line 2.5 m |
318 |
- |
| Red line 3.5 m |
384 |
- |
Adhesive bandages Key features
Adhesive bandages are generally applied to provide support rather than
compression. The adhesive coating helps to ensure that the bandages do not slip
or become displaced.
- Adhesive bandages are comonly used for strapping purposes and to provide
support or compression in the treatment of sprains and strains.
- Diachylon adhesive bandage, more commonly known as Lestreflex, is often
used in place of bandages coated with a zinc oxide adhesive where skin
sensitivity reactions are present or suspected.
Table 19: Adhesive Bandages
| Bandage Type |
Cost (p) |
|
|
|
5 cm |
7.5 cm |
10 cm |
| Elastic Adhesive Bandage BP (£24,828) |
295 |
426 |
567 |
| Elastic Diachylon Bandage BP (£41,391) |
- |
321 |
- |
Surgical Tapes
- Surgical tapes are used to retain dressings and other medical appliances
in position. A number of types are available with various backing materials and
adhesive systems.
- Traditional woven products coated with a zinc oxide-rubber adhesive have
been largely replaced by paper tapes bearing synthetic acrylic adhesives for
general purpose use such as dressing retention.
- Plastic tapes such as Sleek and Blenderm are used where more long term
adhesion is required, particularly in the presence of moisture as in the
fixation of drains.
- A finely woven tape coated with a synthetic adhesive, Leucosilk, is
available where tensile strength and low sensitisation potential is
important.
- The majority of expenditure on surgical tapes is on the paper products.
Micropore is brand leader within this group but substantial savings could be
achieved by the use of alternative products if these are judged to be
clinically acceptable.
Table 20: Surgical tapes
| Tape |
Cost (p) |
|
|
|
|
1.25 cm |
2.5 cm |
5.0 cm |
7.5 cm |
| Lightweight `paper tapes' 5 metre roll |
|
|
|
|
| Scanpor |
39 |
63 |
109 |
- |
| Leukopor |
42 |
66 |
116 |
- |
| Micropore |
54 |
83 |
149 |
- |
| Hypal 2 |
58 |
88 |
163 |
- |
| Zinc Oxide Adhesive Tape BP |
|
|
|
|
| 1 metre roll |
- |
34 |
- |
- |
| 3 metre roll |
53 |
79 |
- |
- |
| 5 metre roll |
74 |
107 |
182 |
276 |
| Elastic Adhesive Tape BP |
|
|
|
|
| 1.5 metre stretched |
- |
72 |
- |
- |
| 4.5 metre stretched |
- |
135 |
- |
- |
| Impermeable Plastic Adhesive Tape BP (Sleek) |
|
|
|
|
| 3 metre roll |
- |
104 |
- |
- |
| 5 metre roll |
- |
156 |
198 |
287 |
| Impermeable Plastic Synthetic Adhesive Tape BP (Blenderm) |
|
|
|
|
| 5 metre roll |
- |
142 |
271 |
- |
| Permeable Woven Synthetic Adhesive Tape BP |
|
|
|
|
| 5 metre roll |
61 |
89 |
157 |
- |
Paste Bandages
Paste bandages consist of an open woven cotton fabric impregnated with a
medicated paste or cream, most of which contain zinc oxide.
- Paste bandages are used for the treatment of eczema[Image-15K], dermatitis[Image-15K] and
similar conditions.
- They are also often applied in conjunction with compression bandages in
the management of venous ulcers
- The principal problem associated with the use of paste bandages is their
tendency to induce skin reactions. This is largely due to the presence of
parabens preservatives.
- A recent addition to the Tariff, Steripaste, is preservative free and
is therefore claimed to be less likely to induce skin reactions.
Table 21: Paste bandages
| Product Group |
Cost (p) |
| Zinc paste bandages BP |
|
| Steripaste (15%) |
288 |
| Viscopaste PB 7 (10%) |
297 |
| Zincaband (15%) |
281 |
| Zinc Paste and Coal Tar Bandage BP |
|
| Tarband |
281 |
| Zinc paste and ichthammol |
|
| Ichthopaste (6/2%) |
300 |
| Icthaband (15/2%) |
281 |
| Zinc paste and calamine |
|
| Calaband |
290 |
| Zinc paste, calamine and clioquinol |
|
| Quinaband |
290 |
Tubular Bandages and Stockinettes
The Drug Tariff contains several different types of tubular bandages and
stockinettes (Table 22)
Table 22: Tubular bandages and stockinettes
| Product Group |
Expenditure (£) |
| Elasticated tubular bandage |
121,591 |
| Lightweight elasticated tubular bandages |
17,230 |
| Plain stockinette |
2,988 |
| Foam padded elasticated tubular bandage |
628 |
| TOTAL |
142,437 |
Elasticated Tubular Bandage
Available in a range of sizes from a number of manufacturers, Elasticated
Tubular Bandage is applied in multiple layers to provide a degree of pressure
and support and following soft tissue injuries.
Despite the fact that it is commonly used in the treatment of venous legulcers[Image-16K], Elasticated Tubular Bandage it is not really suitable for this purpose
as the pressure it produces falls far short of that which is required
clinically.
Although one brand has approximately 99% of the market, significant financial
savings may be achieved by the use of alternative brands where direct
substitutions are possible.. Some caution is required in this context, however,
as the pressure profiles of the six products may vary.
Lightweight Elasticated Tubular Bandages
Two types of lightweight elasticated tubular bandage are included in the
Tariff.
- Tubifast is a lightweight elasticated stockinette that is particularly
useful for holding dressings in place on digits and limbs.
- Netelast has an open net-like structure and can be cut and fashioned
into garments to retain dressings on awkward anatomical sites such as the head
or groins region.
Plain Stockinette
Plain Stockinette is primarily used under orthopaedic casts and as a protective
covering following the application of greasy ointments for the treatment of
dermatological conditions.
Foam Padded Elasticated Tubular Bandage
- Foam Padded Elasticated Tubular Bandage (Tubipad) consists of a length
of Elasticated Tubular Bandage into which is sewn a piece of foam.
- The bandage is used to provide padding and protection against physical
damage particularly for elbows, knees etc.
Pharmaceutical preparations
A summary of expenditure on the pharmaceutical preparations used in wound
management extracted from Sections 13.10 and 13.11 of the Welsh Prescribing
Catalogue is shown in Table 23. Other products such as the polysaccharide bead
dressings Debrisan and Iodosorb, which are also included in Section 13.11 of
the Catalogue, do not appear in this table as these have been identified
separately as `polysaccharide bead dressings' in Table 9
Table 23: Expenditure on pharmaceutical preparations
| Product Group |
Products |
Expenditure (£000) |
| Wound cleansing agents |
Sodium chloride solution |
312,715 |
|
Chlorhexidine/cetrimide solution |
16,650 |
|
Chlorhexidine preparations |
10,376 |
|
Sterile water |
57 |
|
Sub total |
339,798 |
| Antibacterial agents |
Antibiotic powders |
93,723 |
|
Silver sulphadiazine cream |
53,700 |
|
Metronidazole preparations |
52,814 |
|
Povidone-iodine preparations |
13,499 |
|
Sub total |
213,736 |
| Wound debriding agents |
Enzymatic agents |
5,047 |
|
Hydrogen peroxide preparations |
2,455 |
|
Other proprietary preparations |
1,364 |
|
Sodium hypochlorite solutions |
402 |
|
Sub total |
9,268 |
| Miscellaneous |
Cyanoacrylate skin adhesive |
702 |
| products |
Proflavine cream |
471 |
|
Silver nitrate lotion |
143 |
|
Sub total |
1316 |
|
Total |
564,119 |
Wound cleansing agents - Key features
Wound cleansing agents are solutions that are used to cleanse wounds prior to
the application of a dressing. As such they should not be confused with
debriding agents that are generally applied and left in-situ to
facilitate removal of slough or necrotic tissue.
- Most wound-care experts now agree that the routine use of antiseptic
solutions has little place in wound management.
- Antiseptics, particularly those which contain cetrimide, have marked
cytotoxic properties and therefore should be avoided unless the wound is
contaminated or shows clear evidence of infection.
- For most applications, a sterile solution of normal saline is to be
preferred for routine wound cleansing.
Table 24: Wound cleansing solutions
| Cleansing solutions |
Cost (p)* |
| Sodium Chloride Solution |
|
| Irriclens aerosol 250 ml |
298 |
| Normasol 25 ml sachets |
23 |
| Normasol 100 ml sachets |
72 |
| Sterac 150 ml |
83 |
| Sterijet 25 ml plastic amps |
31 |
| Steripod Blue 25 ml plastic amps |
34 |
| Chlorhexidine solution ** |
|
| Sterexidine 0.02%, 150 ml |
83 |
| Steripod pink 20 ml plastic amps |
27 |
| Unisept 25 ml |
23 |
| Unisept 100 ml |
72 |
| Chlorhexidine and cetrimide solution *** |
|
| Steripod Yellow 25 ml plastic amps |
27 |
| Tisept sachets 25 ml |
30 |
| Tisept sachets 100 ml |
72 |
| Travasept 500 ml |
74 |
*
Rounded to nearest p, ** Not recommended for routine use ; *** avoid use where
possibleAntimicrobial agents - Key features
Antimicrobial agents are used to prevent or combat local wound infection.
Numerous preparations are available for this purpose as described in Table 23.
- Antibiotic powders are used mainly in the treatment of infections
in superficial wounds although some are also indicated for larger wounds. These
products contain neomycin that is known to cause skin sensitisation and there
is also a theoretical risk that their application can also lead to the
emergence of resistant strains of bacteria. Antibiotic powders should therefore
probably be avoided or used with extreme caution.
- Silver sulphadiazine cream is used extensively in specialist
centres for the treatment of extensive burns. Because the cream is active
against a wide range of pathogenic organisms, it is also of value in the
treatment of infected leg ulcers and other wounds.
- Metronidazole preparations. Metronidazole is an antibiotic that
is effective against pathogenic anaerobic bacteria often found in necrotic
tissue. As such is a useful agent for combating the odour produced by malignant
or sloughy wounds[Image-16K].
- Povidone iodine preparations. Povidone iodine is a potent
antimicrobial agent that is of value in the treatment of infected wounds[Image-16K]. Like
other antiseptics, however, it should not be used once the infection is brought
under control for it may have an adverse effect upon wound healing.
Table 25: Antimicrobial agents
| Antiseptic/antibiotic preparations |
Cost (£) |
| Betadine dry powder spray 150 g |
2.92 |
| Betadine antiseptic paint 8 ml |
1.06 |
| Tribiotic 110 g |
5.72 |
| Flammazine |
|
| 50 g |
4.30 |
| 500 g |
20.40 |
| Metrotop |
|
| 15 g |
4.95 |
| 30 g |
8.75 |
Wound debriding agents - Key features
Debriding agents are used to remove slough and necrotic tissue from wounds such
as leg ulcers and pressure sores[Image-15K].
- Much controversy surrounds the use of solutions containing hydrogen
peroxide and sodium hypochlorite because they are claimed to delay wound
healing and may also cause adverse effects upon the surrounding skin.
Nevertheless, some practitioners still believe that their short term use may be
justified for the cleansing of particularly dirty or sloughy wounds[Image-16K].
- The continued use of enzymatic debriding agents is similarly questioned,
for although they have been shown to have some benefit in the treatment of
wounds containing semi-liquid slough and purulent exudate, they are ineffective
against wounds containing deep hard necroses.
- More wound care experts now tend to rely upon the use of Intrasite gel
or hydrocolloid dressings to facilitate autolytic wound debridement.
Table 26: Wound debriding agents
| Wound debriding preparations |
Cost (p) |
| Aserbine cream 100 g |
117 |
| Aserbine Solution 500 ml |
176 |
| Chlorosol 25 ml |
36 |
| Hioxyl cream 25 g |
181 |
| Hioxyl cream 100 g |
565 |
| Varidase Combi-Pack |
820 |
Miscellaneous products
Cyanoacrylate skin adhesive is used as an alternative to sutures.
Proflavine cream is an antimicrobial preparation of doubtful efficacy
that has been used for many years to pack cavity wounds and sinuses[Image-15K]. As it also
contains lanolin, it can cause skin sensitivity reactions in some patients.
Silver nitrate lotion is sometimes used as an astringent antibacterial
agent.
(C)1996 Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory
Bridgend General Hospital
Mid Glamorgan